Licensing Options for Generative AI

(note: updated 16 Dec 2023 and 16th Jan 2024 to take into account recent Microsoft Announcements, and 4th March 2024 to update details about Google Gemini)

We are getting a lot of questions about licensing options for generative AI tools, so we thought it would be useful to summarise the current situation.  It’s fair to say that things are still moving quickly,  and there are a fair number of unknowns, particularly around dates and prices for Microsoft’s Copilot for Office 365.

In this article, we are focussing on text-based tools, although many are now multimodal – i.e. can handle images, audio and increasingly video as well as text.

If you’d like to jump directly to a particular section here are direct links:

• The best option for most institutions right now: Microsoft Copilot
• Best free option: Google Gemini
• The expensive but attractive option: Microsoft 365 Copilot
• Best paid option for most individuals (especially advanced users): ChatGPT Plus
• Best paid option for individuals who are heavily invested in Google’s ecosystem: Gemini Advanced

• Providing Indirect Access to Generative AI: Teachermatic

• And what about plain old ChatGPT (free)

The best option for most institutions right now: Microsoft Copilot (was Bing Chat)

Cost: No additional cost to those institutions with A3 and A5 Microsoft licenses.

The best solution right now for providing safe corporate-level access to generative AI is Microsoft Copilot.  Until recently this was known as Bing Chat Enterprise, and you’ll still find it referenced as that in some of the documentation.

The reason we say this is that it has what Microsoft call ‘Commercial Data Protection’:

“User and business data is protected and will not leak outside the organization. You can be confident that chat data is not saved, Microsoft has no eyes-on access to it, and it is not used to train the models.”

In effect, this makes it as safe to use as storing data in Sharepoint and Teams.

To enable Copilot, assuming you have an A3 or A5 license follow these instructions

Pros:

• Commercial Data Protection
• Data not used for model training
• Powered by GPT4
• Cites sources (to a degree!)
• Multimodal (images as well as text)

Cons:

• No access to ChatGPT features like plugins.

Additional comments:

Microsoft has confused everyone by renaming Bing Chat as ‘Copilot’, so we now have many different products with almost the same name! These include Microsoft Copilot (which was Bing Chat), Github Copilot (the coding tool),  Microsoft 365 Copilot, which was what most people thought ‘copilot’ was referring to and is being built into Office, and Copilot in Windows (built into Windows 11).  Here we are talking about the first option.

Also confusingly there is a product called Microsoft Copilot Pro which is only available to those with a family or personal subscription to Microsoft 365, rather than an academic subscription. Here we are talking about ‘Copilot’, not ‘Copilot Pro’

Copilot’s roots are in Bing as a search assistant/replacement. This means it will often start answering by performing a web search, and its choices of source can be of variable quality.  You can control the balance of search vs pure generative AI using a ‘choose conversational style’ option, although it probably isn’t that intuitive to most people.  This means that although copilot is technically the most secure and based on the same model as ChatGPT Plus, users might well express a preference for the latter.

Best free option: Google Gemini

But be sure to provide clear guidance on data privacy – data is not secure.

Cost: Free

If Copilot isn’t suitable, maybe because your organisation doesn’t have the correct Microsoft licenses, or you are very much a Google site, there are still good free options. It may surprise many people that we’ve recommended Gemini (was Bard) rather than ChatGPT.  The reason for this is that ChatGPT (free) is still running on OpenAI’s older GPT 3.5 model, and has many restrictions compared to newer tools, including no capability to deal with images.

Gemini is also available as a paid version, which we have noted separately.

Pros:

• Powered by new Gemini model
• Multimodal (images as well as text)
• Access to the internet
• A nice ‘double-check response’ feature.

Cons:

• No corporate-level data protection features.
• Data used for model training

Additional comments:

Gemini has come on hugely over the last few months, and it’s new Gemini model looks promising. It’s got one feature that should be particularly useful for education – a button to ‘double-check’ responses. Essentially it performs a web search on the content and tells you which it could find a source for, and where. You might ask why it doesn’t do this all the time, and I think it’s just down to speed.

Best paid option for individuals (especially advanced users): ChatGPT Plus

Be sure to provide clear guidance on data privacy – data is not secure.

If you are a heavy generative AI user then ChatGPT Plus might be well worth it.

However, with the standard version, there is no real way to provide enterprise access. Payment is per individual, with each individual needing to enter credit card details.

There is an enterprise edition, but at the moment access to this is very limited. We have had no response from OpenAI about it when we made enquiries, so it can probably be discounted for now as an option for universities and colleges.

This makes ChatGPT Plus more of a personal than an enterprise tool.

Cost: $20 a month

Pros:

• Powered by the newest GPT 4 model
• Multimodal (images as well as text)
• Access to the internet
• Access to features like GPTs

Cons:

• No corporate-level data protection features.
• Payment requires each user to enter card details.
• Data used for model training by default

Additional comments:

ChatGPT Plus mobile application is also excellent (outside of work I use this all the time!).

OpenAI is releasing new features to ChatGPT Plus first, and although making it available to all users is impractical, most institutions will want to make it available to a few users, particularly those tasked with keeping abreast of AI developments, to help understand what is coming.

As with ChatGPT (free) you can opt out of your data being used for training.  This, however, disables the chat history feature and makes the tool fairly useless for most people.  So no personal data etc should be entered.

Best paid option for those who are heavily invested in Google’s ecosystem: Gemini Advanced

But be sure to provide clear guidance on data privacy – data is not secure unless as part of a enterprise subscription.

Cost:

Individuals: £18.99 (but this gives all Google One features)

Enterprise: $20 a month

Gemini Advanced is still fairly new at the time of writing, so hasn’t been tested as extensively as the other options in this post.  It’s either available directly to individuals as as an add-on to an enterprise Google Workspace subscription.

The individual subscription includes Google One, which gives access to amongst other things, 2TB of storage for which would otherwise pay £7.99.

This also includes direct integration in Gmail, Docs, Slides, Sheets, and Meet, which is likely to be attractive if you are heavy user of those tools.

Following controversy about it’s image generation, this features has been withdrawn.

Pros:

• Powered by the newest Gemini Advanced model
• Multimodal (can read images as well as text)
• Access to the internet
• A nice ‘double-check response’ feature.
• Cheaper than Microsoft equivalents, especially of you need all the other Google features included in Google One

Cons:

• Unproven
• Fairly Expensive.
• No image generation at the moment (although it should be reinstated).

The expensive but attractive option: Microsoft 365 Copilot

(this section was updated 16th Jan 2023 following the announcement of the removal of 300 user requirement.)

Cost: $30 per month per user

Not to be confused with Microsoft Copilot (!) – this is the version built in Office 365.  As from 15th January 2024 it was made available to all academic license holders (A3 and A5).

This costs $30 per month per user,  which is £294.40 per year at today’s exchange rate.

It’s possible that this might be good value for very targeted use, but  not feasible for institutional rollout – at £294.40 per user per year, it would cost over £5million to provide it to all students at a 20,000 student institution.

We will be running a small pilot at Jisc shortly so we can give guidance on whether and where it is value for money.  We’ll update as we have more news.

Pros:

• Powered by the newest GPT 4 model
• Multimodal (images as well as text)
• Access to corporate data
• From the videos, lots of timesaving and creative features

Cons:

• Unproven
• Expensive.

Providing Indirect Access to Generative AI: Teachermatic

(other similar tools existing in this space).

Cost: Free to £18 a month

The other way of providing access to generative AI is via a tool that is powered by Generative AI. We’ve focussed our answer on Teachermatic as an example, as we are currently piloting it.

By default, data submitted to the model via the APIs isn’t used for training, which makes them much more secure. Obviously the user experience is very different to just using a chatbot.  This might well be just the thing for specific tasks, like the generators for common teaching activities in Teachermatic, but it’s not a more general solution.

Pros:

• Data not used for model training
• Prompting skills are not required.

Cons:

• Not a general-purpose tool

And what about plain old ChatGPT (free)

Be sure to provide clear guidance on data privacy – data is not secure.

Cost: Free

The ‘hoover’ of the generative AI world, and the one that most people first think of.  It’s still very capable, but hasn’t been upgraded for a long time (in AI terms!) and so is no longer the very best option for most people.  Still, we recommend everyone at least give it a try, as it’s fast, and in some ways still has a much cleaner user experience than our recommended options, so some will prefer it.

Cost: free

Pros:

• The original!
• Fast
• A very uncluttered user experience

Cons:

• No corporate-level data protection features.
• Old GPT 3.5 model
• No multimodal facilities.

And finally…

There are many other Generative AI tools that we haven’t mentioned. These include other similar tools like Perplexity and Claude, tools for specific tasks like Gamma, and tools built into social networking, like Snapchat, along with the many creative tools.  We’ve also not talked about open-source options – for most people, we don’t think self-hosting is a viable option at the moment. Let us know if you would like us to explore any of those in more detail.

 

Updates:

 

4 Mar 2024

Addition of a new section Best paid option for individuals who are heavily investing in Google ecosystem: Gemini Advanced, and update of name from Bard to Gemini.

16 Jan 2024

The section ”The expensive but attractive option: Microsoft 365 Copilot’ has been updated to reflect Microsoft announcing the removal of the 300 user requirement’, and the Copilot section updated to explain that it isn’t talking about Copilot Pro.

16 Dec 2023

The section ‘The option that many people are waiting for: Microsoft 365 Copilot‘ was renamed ‘The expensive but attractive option: Microsoft 365 Copilot’ after Microsoft announced it would be made available to A3 and A5 licenses on the same terms.

 

---

Find out more by visiting our Artificial Intelligence page to view publications and resources, join us for events and discover what AI has to offer through our range of interactive online demos.

For regular updates from the team sign up to our mailing list.

Get in touch with the team directly at AI@jisc.ac.uk